When it comes to the design of a power supply that needs to convert AC mains voltage into a fixed DC voltage, it is the norm to think that a transformer is required to achieve that design goal. In this article, a different alternative will be presented, and more importantly, it will be simulated and compared to the standard transformer solution in terms of cost, size and performance.
A popular way to step down a voltage used everywhere in low voltage/current applications is the voltage divider.
A transformerless power supply uses that principle to step down the voltage to the desired level, but instead of using a resistor it uses an X-rated capacitor which takes advantage of a property called reactance.
The reactance of a capacitor is the resistance value the capacitor will show in series for a particular frequency and capacitor value. Therefore, by choosing a capacitor value we can calculate the reactance with the formula:
Rx = 1/(2*pi*f*C)
As the circuit is connected to the AC mains, it is essential that an X-rated capacitor is used. An X-rated capacitor is specially designed to withstand high voltage spikes and to avoid a short circuit between the plates in case the capacitor breaks.
it is essential that an X-rated capacitor is used
Note that this article focuses on simulating the transformerless power supply and comparing it with a transformer PSU. If you want a more in-depth explanation of the theory behind please check this article at Hackaday and CircuitDigest.
Transformerless PSU Design
The PSU will have the following design specs
- Step down and rectify 220VAC/50Hz into 12VDC
- The PSU must be able to source up to 75mA of current to the load
The following circuit topology was taken from the different consulted references:
V1: The max amplitude is 220V*SRQT(2) at 50Hz
R4: bleeding resistor to discharge the capacitor when the AC connection is removed
R3 and R2: current limiting resistors
D1-D4: Discrete full bridge rectifier to convert the AC waveform into a DC voltage
C2: bulk capacitor to smooth the output voltage of the rectifier
D5: 12V Zener diode to prevent a higher voltage to be fed to the load
Choosing the X-rated capacitor C1
In order to source enough current to the load, we need a theoretical reactance of:
Rx = 220V/0.075A
Rx = 2933.33ohm
Therefore, we need a capacitance of:
C = 1/(2*pi*50Hz*2933.33ohm)
C = 1.085uF
A value of 2.2uF will be selected for the simulation with a theoretical reactance of:
R = 1/(2*pi*50Hz*2.2uFohm)
R = 1445ohm
The above circuit was simulated using LTSpice with two different conditions, at max load and at low current (5mA). Three different points were probed: VCC (expected 12V), I(R1) which is the load current and the current going through the Zener diode I(D5).
Max load (75mA)
Low current (5mA)
Analysis of simulation
As we can see from the above graphs, the power supply is capable of delivering up to 75mA at 12V. However, the Zener diode and current limiting resistors R3 and R2 are constantly dissipating a considerable amount of heat in order to maintain a stable power supply.
Dz_pdiss = 12V*0.084A = 1W
R2_pdiss = 100ohms*(0.084+0.05)^2 =0.8W
R4_pdis =~ R2_pdiss
Comparison with a standard transformer PSU
With the data obtained from the simulation, commercial components can be selected from a supplier in order to compare the cost and size of the two different solutions.
Components that are present in both solutions will not be quoted, such as the bulk capacitor C2.
All prices are valid for the 22/08/18 on Digikey for 1000 units
C1 – EMI SUPP MP X2 RAD 310VAC 2.2UFX2 – 0.73$/unit
R2 – RES 100 OHM 1W 5% AXIAL– 0.023$/unit
R3 – RES 100 OHM 1W 5% AXIAL– 0.023$/unit
R4 – RES 470K OHM 1/2W 5% CF MINI – 0.01$/unit
D5 – DIODE ZENER 12V 1.25W DO214AC – 0.11$/unit
Total = 0.9$/unit
T1 – XFRMR LAMINATED 2.4VA THRU HOLE – 2.7$/unit
Total = 2.7$/unit
Space on a PCB is a bit relative, as it depends how you place and in what side the components are the traces width and max component height. For this comparison, we will just sum the total area the components used in a 2D plane.
C1 = 26mm*13mm = 338mm2
R2 and R3 = (2.4*6.3)mm*2 = 30.24mm2
R4 = 2.3mm*6.5mm = 14.95mm2
D5 = 4.5mm*2.5mm = 11.25mm2
Total area = 395mm2
T1 = 34.93mm*28.58mm = 1000mm2 = total area
This section will analyze the trade-offs of the transformerless power supply compared to a transformer solution
Dissipation and efficiency
The transformerless circuit has some serious issues regarding dissipation and efficiency.
As calculated above, the different components including the resistors and the Zener diode can dissipate up to 1 watt each. Apart from the fact that the components will get hot constantly which will decrease their lifetime, particularly the Zener diode, we have the following situation in terms of efficiency:
Our load of 12V and 0.075A is consuming 0.9W, however, in order for the circuit to supply this current and voltage, it needs to dissipate at least 3 times the amount of power required by the circuit in other components (R2, R3 and D1)!
In comparison, the regular transformer will only have an efficiency of 90% to 95%.
The following table summarizes the findings discussed above:
[table id=1 /]
As we can see from the table, the transformerless PSU is definitely cheaper and can be designed smaller and lighter than a transformer PSU.
However, it comes at a high cost in performance and efficiency as it is constantly dissipating a considerable amount of power.
Therefore the ideal application for a power supply like this could be on a device that operates at a low ambient temperature (below 25C) and has access to an ample amount of energy. A sensor placed somewhere in Iceland at a geothermal power generation plant? Could be.
Have you built a transformerless PSU before? Share your challenges and findings!
THE ABOVE CIRCUIT HAS NOT BEEN BUILT OR TESTED AND THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT IT WILL WORK.
IF YOU DECIDE TO BUILD IT DO IT AT YOUR OWN RISK, BE EXTREMELY CAREFUL WITH AC MAINS VOLTAGE AND PUT A FUSE AFTER THE LIVE INPUT!
Transformerless Power Supply – CircuitDigest